Supergods is a scattered, often fascinating book about superhero comics – well worth reading if you happen to be a comics nerd like me. But there are two passages in it that I believe would be of interest to a much broader audience. If you're interested in the magic of life or the vastness of human potential, I urge you to check them out. I've taken the pains to type them up for your perusal. Ain't I just a sport?
Obviously, I hold no rights to the text below, and I will happily remove it from this blog if anyone thinks it worth the trouble to ask me to.
Excerpt #1 (from Chapter 26: Star, Legend, Superhero, Supergod?)
Mark Millar, Tom Peyer, Mark Waid, and I had approached DC
in 1999 with the idea of relaunching Superman for a new generation in a series
to be entitled Superman Now or Superman
2000, depending on which version of the
story synopsis you read. We’d
spent many enjoyable hours in conversation, working out how to restore our
beloved Superman to his preeminent place as the world’s first and best
superhero. Following the lead of
the Lois and Clark TV show, the
comic-book Superman had, at long last, put a ring on his long-suffering
girlfriend’s finger and carried her across the threshold to holy matrimony
after six decades of dodging the issue – although it was Clark Kent
whom Lois married in public, while Superman had to conceal his wedding band
every time he switched from his sober suit and tie. This newly domesticated Superman was a somehow diminished
figure, all but sleepwalking through a sequence of increasingly contrived
“event” story lines, which tried in vain to hit the heights of “The Death of
Superman” seven years previously. Superman
Now was to be a reaction against this often
overemotional and ineffectual Man of Steel, reuniting him with his mythic
potential, his archetypal purpose, but there was one fix we couldn’t seem to
wrap our collective imagination around: the marriage. The Clark-Lois-Superman triangle – “Clark loves Lois. Lois loves Superman. Superman loves Clark,” as Elliot S.
Maggin put it in his intelligent, charming Superman novel Miracle
Monday – seemed intrinsic to the appeal of
the stories, but none of us wanted to simply undo the relationship using
sorcery, or “memory wipes,” or any other of the hundreds of cheap and unlikely
magic-wan plot devices we could have dredged up from the bottom of the barrel.
Stuck with the problem, I found myself chewing it over with
my JLA editor Dan Raspler at one in the morning in an airless hotel room
overlooking the naval yards of San Diego harbor. We were there for 1999’s Comic-Con. To clear our heads, we went downstairs
and crossed the street, an oddly landscaped liminal zone between the rail
tracks and the city. We were deep
in discussion, debating earnestly the merits and demerits of a married Superman
when we both spotted a couple of men crossing the tracks into town. One was an ordinary-looking bearded
dude, at first sight like any of a hundred thousand comics fans. But the other was Superman. He was dressed in a perfectly tailored
red, blue, and yellow costume; his hair was slicked back with a kiss curl; and
unlike the often weedy or paunchy Supermen who paraded through the convention
halls, he was trim, buff, and handsome.
He was the most convincing Superman I’ve ever seen, looking somewhat
like a cross between Christopher Reeve and the actor Billy Zane. I knew a visitation when I saw one.
Racing to intercept the pair, Dan and I explained who we
were, what we were doing, and asked “Superman” if he wouldn’t mind answering a
few questions. He didn’t, and sat
on a concrete bollard with one knee to his chest shield, completely
relaxed. It occurred to me that
this was exactly how Superman would sit.
A man who was invulnerable to all harm would be always relaxed and at
ease. He’d have no need for the kind
of physically aggressive postures superheroes tended to go in for. I suddenly began to understand Superman
in a new way. We asked questions,
“How do you feel about Lois?,” “What about Batman?,” and received answers in
the voice and persona of Superman – “I don’t think Lois will ever really
understand me or why I do what I do” or “Batman sees only the darkness in
people’s hearts. I wish he could
see the best” – that seemed utterly convincing.
The whole encounter lasted an hour and a half, then he left,
graciously, and on foot I’m sad to say.
Dan and I stared at each other in the fuzzy sodium glare of the
streetlamps then quietly returned to our rooms. Enflamed, I stayed awake the whole night, writing about
Superman until the fuming August sun rose above the warships, the hangars, and
the Pacific. I was now certain we
could keep the marriage to Lois and simply make it work to our advantage.
1 comment:
This is great. I happened to read this post soon after writing a journal entry inspired by the William James quote, "The greatest weapon against stress is our ability to choose one thought over another." My meandering ideas were mostly concerned with the ability to choose one interpretation over another. I think it's important to know how to select a pleasant thought over an unpleasant one, but the advanced version of the skill is to take even potentially stressful thoughts and circumstances, and choose to view them in a positive way. Here, Morrison demonstrates the technique of conscious choice at its most rewarding level: not just avoiding stress, but creating magic.
Post a Comment