Sunday, October 7, 2012

SUPERGODS, by Grant Morrison: Excerpt 1 of 2


Supergods is a scattered, often fascinating book about superhero comics – well worth reading if you happen to be a comics nerd like me.  But there are two passages in it that I believe would be of interest to a much broader audience.  If you're interested in the magic of life or the vastness of human potential, I urge you to check them out.  I've taken the pains to type them up for your perusal.  Ain't I just a sport?

Obviously, I hold no rights to the text below, and I will happily remove it from this blog if anyone thinks it worth the trouble to ask me to.


Excerpt #1 (from Chapter 26: Star, Legend, Superhero, Supergod?)

Mark Millar, Tom Peyer, Mark Waid, and I had approached DC in 1999 with the idea of relaunching Superman for a new generation in a series to be entitled Superman Now or Superman 2000, depending on which version of the story synopsis you read.  We’d spent many enjoyable hours in conversation, working out how to restore our beloved Superman to his preeminent place as the world’s first and best superhero.  Following the lead of the Lois and Clark TV show, the comic-book Superman had, at long last, put a ring on his long-suffering girlfriend’s finger and carried her across the threshold to holy matrimony after six decades of dodging the issue – although it was Clark Kent whom Lois married in public, while Superman had to conceal his wedding band every time he switched from his sober suit and tie.  This newly domesticated Superman was a somehow diminished figure, all but sleepwalking through a sequence of increasingly contrived “event” story lines, which tried in vain to hit the heights of “The Death of Superman” seven years previously.  Superman Now was to be a reaction against this often overemotional and ineffectual Man of Steel, reuniting him with his mythic potential, his archetypal purpose, but there was one fix we couldn’t seem to wrap our collective imagination around: the marriage.  The Clark-Lois-Superman triangle – “Clark loves Lois.  Lois loves Superman.  Superman loves Clark,” as Elliot S. Maggin put it in his intelligent, charming Superman novel Miracle Monday – seemed intrinsic to the appeal of the stories, but none of us wanted to simply undo the relationship using sorcery, or “memory wipes,” or any other of the hundreds of cheap and unlikely magic-wan plot devices we could have dredged up from the bottom of the barrel.

Stuck with the problem, I found myself chewing it over with my JLA editor Dan Raspler at one in the morning in an airless hotel room overlooking the naval yards of San Diego harbor.  We were there for 1999’s Comic-Con.  To clear our heads, we went downstairs and crossed the street, an oddly landscaped liminal zone between the rail tracks and the city.  We were deep in discussion, debating earnestly the merits and demerits of a married Superman when we both spotted a couple of men crossing the tracks into town.  One was an ordinary-looking bearded dude, at first sight like any of a hundred thousand comics fans.  But the other was Superman.  He was dressed in a perfectly tailored red, blue, and yellow costume; his hair was slicked back with a kiss curl; and unlike the often weedy or paunchy Supermen who paraded through the convention halls, he was trim, buff, and handsome.  He was the most convincing Superman I’ve ever seen, looking somewhat like a cross between Christopher Reeve and the actor Billy Zane.  I knew a visitation when I saw one.

Racing to intercept the pair, Dan and I explained who we were, what we were doing, and asked “Superman” if he wouldn’t mind answering a few questions.  He didn’t, and sat on a concrete bollard with one knee to his chest shield, completely relaxed.  It occurred to me that this was exactly how Superman would sit.  A man who was invulnerable to all harm would be always relaxed and at ease.  He’d have no need for the kind of physically aggressive postures superheroes tended to go in for.  I suddenly began to understand Superman in a new way.  We asked questions, “How do you feel about Lois?,” “What about Batman?,” and received answers in the voice and persona of Superman – “I don’t think Lois will ever really understand me or why I do what I do” or “Batman sees only the darkness in people’s hearts.  I wish he could see the best” – that seemed utterly convincing.

The whole encounter lasted an hour and a half, then he left, graciously, and on foot I’m sad to say.  Dan and I stared at each other in the fuzzy sodium glare of the streetlamps then quietly returned to our rooms.  Enflamed, I stayed awake the whole night, writing about Superman until the fuming August sun rose above the warships, the hangars, and the Pacific.  I was now certain we could keep the marriage to Lois and simply make it work to our advantage.

Bumping into someone dressed as Superman at the San Diego Comic Convention may sound about as wondrous and unlikely as meeting an alcoholic at an AA meeting, of course, but it rarely happens at night, and of the dozens of Men of Steel I’ve witnessed marching up and down the aisles at Comic-Con, or posing with tourists outside Mann’s Chinese on Hollywood Boulevard, not one was ever as convincing as the Superman who appeared at the precise moment I needed him most.  This is what I mean when I talk about magic: by choosing to frame my encounter as a pop-shamanic vision quest yielding pure contact with embodied archetypal forces, I got much more out of it than if I’d simply sat there with Dan sniggering at the delusional fool in tights.  By telling myself a very specific story about what was occurring, I was able to benefit artistically, financially, and I like to think spiritually, in a way that perhaps might not have been possible had I simply assumed that our Superman was a convention “cosplayer.”  Superman Now never happened, but I’d come to envisage a Superman project that would serve as the pinnacle of my work on hero comics, and a way to put all of my thoughts about superheroes into a single piece.

1 comment:

Caitlin said...

This is great. I happened to read this post soon after writing a journal entry inspired by the William James quote, "The greatest weapon against stress is our ability to choose one thought over another." My meandering ideas were mostly concerned with the ability to choose one interpretation over another. I think it's important to know how to select a pleasant thought over an unpleasant one, but the advanced version of the skill is to take even potentially stressful thoughts and circumstances, and choose to view them in a positive way. Here, Morrison demonstrates the technique of conscious choice at its most rewarding level: not just avoiding stress, but creating magic.